Amatisto v. Paz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a tenant who brought counterclaims in good faith that were ultimately rejected retained possession because she had paid her rent into court
• \A tenant need not pay rent into court voluntarily in order to reap the benefits of the statute.\
• outcome inconclusive when landlord prevailed on tenant’s counterclaims, but tenant prevailed on possession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2004-10-20· cited 27×
• Timmermann v. Herman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-02· cited 5×
• Lopez v. Kilbourne
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-10-21· cited 5×
• Whittle v. Marion County District Court
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-08-21· cited 3×
• Barbara Parmenter Living Trust v. Lemon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-05-16· cited 2×
• Eddy v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-09-19· cited 2×
• Commonwealth Property Management, Inc. v. Hanson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-11-23· cited 2×
• Tanner v. Grissom
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-06-28· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Marquam Investment Corp. v. Myers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-07-05· cited 43×
• L & M Investment Co. v. Morrison
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-05-15· cited 23×
• Napolski v. Champney
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-07-26· cited 19×
• Helmer v. Transamerica Title Insurance
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-09-13· cited 11×
• Ierulli v. Lutz Development Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-04-17· cited 3×