Amarr Co. v. Kappos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “knowledge of where an individual resides . . . is insufficient to establish jurisdiction”
• explaining that “knowledge of where an individual resides . . . is insufficient to establish jurisdiction”
• allegations that “defendants knew [plaintiff] practiced law in Pennsylvania when they released the letter to the media” were insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).