Skip to main content
· 10/10/1984

Amarnare v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.

Citations

  • 611 F. Supp. 344
  • 36 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 6
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22888
  • 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,909

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that temporary employee was employee of both temporary agency and special employer for purposes of Title VII
  • observing in ADA case that whether an entity is an “employer” is a question of law
  • “[w]hen an employer has the right to control the means and manner of an individual’s performance ... an employer-employee relationship is likely to exist. Factors other than control are then of marginal importance.” (footnote omitted)
  • “When an employer has the right to control the means and manner of an individual’s performance, as [defendant] allegedly had with regards to [temporary worker], an employer- employee relationship is likely to exist.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edward Weinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.