Skip to main content
· 1/2/1975

Amant v. Pacific Power & Light Co.

Citations

  • 529 P.2d 829
  • 84 Wash. 2d 872
  • 1975 Wash. LEXIS 1111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Construction contract provided that the methods and equipment used in fulfilling the contract were to have the approval of the engineer. Therefore, trial court erred in entering summary judgment in favor of an engineer.
  • Construction contract provided that the methods and equipment used in fulfilling the contract were to have the approval of the engineer. Therefore, trial court erred in entering summary judgment in favor of an engineer.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.