Skip to main content
· 11/17/2020

Amanda Jean Nails v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an order on a motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens is “subject to reversal and remand as insufficient where, as here, there is neither (1) ‘meaningful analysis’ in the order, nor (2
  • “A trial court’s order denying a motion to dismiss on grounds of forum non conveniens is subject to reversal where, as here, there is neither (1) ‘meaningful analysis’ in the order, nor (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.