Amanda Foods (Vietnam) Ltd. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To determine the dumping margin for non-mandatory respondents in NME cases (that is, to determine the ‘separate rates’ margin), Commerce normally relies on the ‘all others rate’ provision of 19 U.S.C. § 1673d(c)(5).”
• “To determine the dumping margin for non-mandatory respondents in NME cases (that is, to determine the ‘separate rates’ margin), Commerce normally relies on the ‘all others rate’ provision of 19 U.S.C. § 1673d(c)(5).”
• final results and final partial rescission of anti-dumping duty administrative review
• final results and final partial rescission of AD duty administrative review
• final results and final partial rescission of AD duty administrative review
• “Nor has Commerce explained why the difference between Bangladesh and Vietnam, in per capita GDP, is not relevant in this case or why the difference in economic similarity to Vietnam is outweighed by the differences in quality of data between Bangladesh and India.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).