Skip to main content
· 6/3/2024

Amanda Curlee v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC

Citations

  • 104 F.4th 212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting a policy’s “legally entitled to recover” language under contract law and holding that the entitlement exists at the time of the accident, not at the time of the UIM claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.