Amanda Campion and James Campion v. City of Tucson
Citations
- 536 P.3d 1232
- 105 Arizona Cases Digest 4
Syllabus
1. Are the issues raised in the Campions' motion for partial summary judgment, which was denied on the basis of disputes of material fact, reviewable on appeal after a trial on the merits? 2. Did the trial court err by granting the City's motion for partial summary judgment on the basis of \absolute immunity\ under A.R.S. § 12-820.01? 3. Did the trial court err by limiting the scope of the City's disclosure obligations? 4. Did the trial court err by excluding the issue of negligence from the \separate\ trial on the City's affirmative defense under A.R.S. § 12-820.03? 5. Did the trial court err in certain evidentiary rulings? 6. Did the trial court err by refusing to give the Campions' requested jury instructions?
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.