Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, District Local No. 540 v. Neuhoff Bros. Packers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, regarding evidentiary rulings, an arbitrator \has great flexibility and the courts should not review the legal adequacy of his evidentiary rulings\
• explaining “the arbitrator has great flexibility and the courts should not review the legal adequacy of his evidentiary rulings”
• upholding an arbitrator’s award and opining that it was permissible to allow the arbitrator to establish the burden of proof he felt appropriate
• viewed as a question of evidence, the arbitrator has great flexibility and the courts should not review the legal adequacy of his evidentiary rulings
• viewed as a question of evidence, the arbitrator has great flexibility and the courts should not review the legal adequacy of his evidentiary rulings
• \[T]he arbitrator has great flexibility and the courts should not review the legal adequacy of his evidentiary rulings.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).