Skip to main content
· 6/4/1993

Amalgamated Bank of New York v. Marsh

Citations

  • 823 F. Supp. 209
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7487
  • 1993 WL 200160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that major creditors of alleged enterprise could not be liable for violations of § 1962(c
  • knowing receipt of stolen trade secrets does not constitute participation in the RICO enterprise
  • defendant who received false checks and cashed them with knowledge that they were fraudulently obtained by other defendant did not participate in the conduct of the enterprise’s affairs
  • mere acceptance of fraudulent proceeds insufficient to show “operation or management”
  • discussing Second Circuit’s broader pre-Reves interpretation of § 1962(c)
  • complaint must include minimum factual basis for allegations of scienter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert J. Ward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.