Skip to main content
· 10/31/2011

Amalfitano v. State

Citations

  • 956 N.E.2d 208
  • 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1868
  • 2011 WL 5120748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by failing to find the defendant’s guilty plea as a mitigating factor
  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by failing to find the defendant’s guilty plea as a mitigating factor
  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by failing to find the defendant’s guilty plea as a mitigating factor
  • observing that a guilty plea based on pragmatic considerations is entitled to less mitigating weight
  • noting that a guilty plea is not necessarily a mitigating factor where the defendant receives a substantial benefit from it or where the evidence is so strong the plea is merely a pragmatic decision
  • finding no mitigator in alleged remorse because trial court had authority to assess credibility of witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.