Amalfitano v. Rosenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]here is no issue that the Amalfitanos were damaged by Rosenberg’s deceit. ... [P]laintiffs were forced to pay the costs of defending themselves in an action which was founded upon [a] deceitful premise .. ..”
• attorney who had “brought suit against plaintiffs despite knowing that it was entirely baseless” was liable to plaintiffs in damages for their costs incurred “in defending themselves against an action which was founded upon [a] deceitful premise”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Amalfitano v. Rosenberg
  New York Court of Appeals· 2009-02-12· cited 80×
• Amalfitano v. Rosenberg
  Second Circuit· 2008-07-15· cited 48×
• Ray v. Watnick
  S.D. New York· 2016-04-26· cited 19×
• Bryant v. Silverman
  S.D. Illinois· 2018-02-14· cited 18×
• Rice v. City of New York
  E.D. New York· 2017-07-26· cited 10×
• Dupree v. Voorhees
  New York Supreme Court· 2009-03-23· cited 2×
• Amalfitano v. Rosenberg
  Second Circuit· 2008-08-06
• Rowland Martin, Jr. v. Edward L. Bravenec and 1216 West Ave., Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2015-02-26
• Rowland Martin, Jr. v. Edward L. Bravenec and 1216 West Ave., Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2015-01-05
• in Re Rowland Martin
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2015-03-13
• Bill Birds v. Stein Law Firm
  New York Court of Appeals· 2020-03-31
• In re Rosenberg
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2012-06-05