Amadou Sall v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the IJ misstated the burden of proof by putting it on the applicant before the government established a prima facie case of firm resettlement
• noting that the IJ misstated the burden of proof by putting it on the applicant before the government established a prima facie case of firm resettlement
• noting that the IJ mis- stated the burden of proof by putting it on the applicant before the government established a prima facie case of firm resettle- ment
• remanding because of errors in determining firm resettlement after concluding that “we cannot confidently state that the IJ will deny asylum if we remand”
• adopting a broader, \totality of the circumstances approach\ and treating non-offer-based evidence on a par with offer-based evidence
• adopting a broader, “totality of the circumstances approach” and treating non-offer-based evidence on a par with offer-based evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).