Amado Miranda, an Individual Esperanza Miranda, an Individual v. Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States of America Does 1-100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court lacked jurisdiction of a similar removal order
• holding that the bar on petitioner’s return to the United States because of an aggravated felony conviction did not constitute a restraint sufficient to allow the federal courts to exercise habeas jurisdiction over his claims
• rejecting 9 argument that court has federal question jurisdiction over constitutional claims under § 10 1331 because § 1252(a)(2)(C)’s “notwithstanding any other provision of law (statutory or 11 nonstatutory)” stripped federal courts of jurisdiction
• finding no extreme circumstances because petitioner was removed pursuant to an IJ’s order after a hearing at which he was represented by counsel, and he was not subject to restraints “not shared by the public generally that significantly confine and restrain his freedom”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).