AM VETS POST 100 v. Richland County Council

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no implied field preemption when a state statute regulating bingo referenced a county-level licensing system for the same
• no preemption of the regulation of bingo but rather that the statute contemplated further regulation by counties and municipalities
• no preemption of the regulation of bingo but rather that the statute contemplated further regulation by counties and municipalities
• state statute contemplated further regulation of bingo by counties 'as it referred to licensing by counties
• fact that ordinance requires more than statute creates no conflict, unless the statute limits the requirement for all cases to its own prescription
• where the language of the statute contemplated additional regulation of the game of bingo at the local level, there was not preemption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).