A.M. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that robbery by sudden snatching “does not require that the offender use or threaten to use any force or violence in order to commit the crime of robbery by sudden snatching. In fact, no force whatsoever is required ‘beyond 1 See Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.110(k

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• C.A. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-10· cited 1×
• O.A. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-09-03
• Patios West One Condominium Association, Inc. v. American Coastal Insurance Company
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-01-03

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Holly v. Auld
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-05-03· cited 735×
• Puryear v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-02-07· cited 124×
• KE v. Department of Juvenile Justice
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-14· cited 11×
• JW v. Leitner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-14· cited 6×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-11· cited 6×
• TT v. Esteves
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-16· cited 5×
• T.K. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-12· cited 3×
• J.L.B. v. Kelly
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-01· cited 3×
• C.J. v. Rolle
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-03· cited 3×