Am. Mfrs. of Multilayered Wood Flooring v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Board has not been granted appellate jurisdiction over cases concerning the proper classification of a position
• observing that the Board lacks jurisdiction over classification appeals
• dismissing case “concerning the proper classification of a position” because “[t]he juris- diction of the [B]oard is limited to those matters specifically delineated by Congress or granted to it by way of regula- tory authority exercised by the OPM”
• dismissing case “concerning the proper classification of a position” because “[t]he juris- diction of the [B]oard is limited to those matters specifically delineated by Congress or granted to it by way of regula- tory authority exercised by the OPM”
• after challenging at his agency the reclassification of his position, employee “appealed his reclassification to the Office of Personnel Management”
• “Section 2302(b) is not an independent source of appellate jurisdiction and does not itself authorize an appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).