Am. Isuzu Motors, Inc. v. Ntsebeza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating affirmance of a 46-month Guidelines sentence for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 and remanding for further consideration in light of Gall
• holding in a concurring opinion by Judge Hall that a claim for aiding and abetting requires proof that the defendant knew that the “tools, instrumentalities, or services” it provided would be used to commit an unlawful act
• finding no prejudice where communication between juror and witness, during which juror told witness he had a good memory, was “terse, fortuitous, and devoid of substantive content”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).