Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no additional discovery regarding intent of parties allowed where regulatory exclusion clearly excludes claims by FDIC and is not ambiguous
• “[i]t seems illogical to conclude that enforcement of the regulatory exclusion would violate public policy in the face of a congressional enactment which provides for the receiver’s enforcement of any contract, except a directors’ or officers’ liability insurance contract____”
• discussing similarities and overlapping functions of these agencies
• Schwartz Aff. at Ex. A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).