Alzina Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the school liaison officer was employed by the Indianapolis Public School Police
• noting that the school liaison officer was employed by the Indianapolis Public School Police
• determining that an officer's removal of a student from class and questioning the student as to whether he had drugs did not violate the Fourth Amendment because the officer had received an anonymous tip that the student had drugs on his person that day
• determining that an officer’s removal of a student from class and questioning the student as to whether he had drugs did not violate the Fourth Amendment because the officer had received an anonymous tip that the student had drugs on his person that day
• “[T]he decisions of Indiana courts subsequent to T.L.O . indicate that the exclusionary rule is the remedy for Fourth Amendm ent violations occurring in schools.”
• “Significant authority exists for the proposition that a security or school officer who compels or restrains a student’s movement seizes the student for Fourth Amendment purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).