Skip to main content
· 2/9/2024

Alyssa Pratt v. Adam B. Smith, Adam Smith, M.D., P.C., and Tri-State Specialists, L.L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the passage of chapter 43 did not foreclose removal for in- adequate performance under chapter 75
  • recognizing that an agency may rely on either chapter 75 or chapter 43 to take a performance-based action
  • acknowledging that “deference is appropriately given to the MSPB’s interpretation of the CSRA”
  • emphasizing that the statutory term “unacceptable performance” in chapter 43 is not a synonym for generally poor performance or inefficiency but rather is a term of art specifically defined under 5 U.S.C. § 4301(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.