Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. State, Department of Environmental Conservation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that careful reading of statute gave the party constructive notice that it might be subject to fees
• holding that agency did not enact regulation when it decided whether certain costs were among those agency could recoup from regulated party
• holding that administrative regulation provided constitutionally sufficient notice of cost-shifting policy, even though policy was not explicit and party alleged that if it had known it would have litigated differently
• \Whether an agency action is a 'regulation' requiring rulemaking under the Alaska Administrative Procedure Act is a question of law that does not involve agency expertise and that we therefore review applying our independent judgment.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).