Alycekay Co. v. Hasko Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where the trustee received actual notice of the claim, the service of process that was effected “satisfied fundamental requirements of due process and was not a substantial defect” in the process
• concluding that where the trustee received actual notice of the claim, the service of process that was effected “satisfied fundamental requirements of due process and was not a substantial defect” in the process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rental Properties Owners Ass'n v. Kent County Treasurer
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2014-12-18· cited 151×
• Gillie v. GENESEE COUNTY TREASURER
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2008-02-28· cited 28×
• Gavulic v. Boyer
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1992-07-07· cited 12×
• Harvey Cadillac Co. v. Rahain
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1994-03-22· cited 2×
• in Re Petition of Kent County Land Bank Authority
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2014-12-18

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Deeb v. Berri
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-08-23· cited 21×
• Reed v. Walsh
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-07-18· cited 14×
• Dogan v. MICH. BASIC PROP. INS. ASS'N
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-11-07· cited 11×
• Bunner v. Blow-Rite Insulation Co.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-09-08· cited 9×
• Dollar Rent-A-Car Systems v. Nodel Construction
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-11-08· cited 7×
• Emmons v. Emmons
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1984-07-09· cited 7×