Alvarez v. Rendon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party breaches by anticipatory repudiation where a party engages in “words or acts evincing an intention to refuse performance in the future.”
• concluding proper remedy for inconsistent jury verdict in breach of employment contract action by physician and counterclaim by employer was a new trial
• “To preserve the issue of an inconsistent verdict for review on appeal, the party claiming inconsistency must raise the issue before the jury is discharged.” (citation omitted)
• “An anticipatory breach of contract occurs before the time has come when there is a present duty to perform as the result of words or acts evincing an intention to refuse performance in the future.”
• “An anticipatory breach of contract occurs before the time has come when there is a present duty to perform as the result of words or acts evincing an intention to refuse performance in the future.”
• “An anticipatory breach of contract occurs before the time has come when there is a present duty to perform as the result of words or acts evincing an intention to refuse performance in the future.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).