Alvarez v. DeAguirre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \a trial judge may deny further amendments where a case has progressed to a point that liberality ordinarily to be indulged has diminished\
• explaining that in addition to the desirability of allowing amendments to pleadings so that cases may be concluded on their merits, there is an equally compelling obligation on the court to see to it that the end of all litigation be finally reached
• explaining that in addition to the desirability of allowing amendments to pleadings so that cases may be concluded on their merits, there is an equally compelling obligation on the court to see to it that the end of all litigation be finally reached
• explaining that in addition to the desirability of allowing amendments to pleadings so that cases may be concluded on their merits, there is an equally compelling obligation on the court to see to it that the end of all litigation be finally reached
• trial judge properly denied further amendments and dismissed fifth amended complaint where case progressed to point where liberality of amendment ordinarily indulged had diminished
• “‘[G]enerally three ineffective attempts to state the same cause of action or defense are enough,’ and the ‘liberality in permitting amendments decreases as the action progresses and as the number of amended pleading increases.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).