Alvarado v. U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court had jurisdiction to review the IJ’s conclusion that respondent had failed to timely request voluntary departure because that was a “non-discretionary judgment regarding . . . statutory eligibility to request discretionary relief”
• “We review issues of statutory interpretation de novo, but we defer to a reasonable interpretation of the statute by the agency that administers it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).