Skip to main content
· 9/8/2010

Alvarado-Santos v. Department of Health of Commonwealth

Citations

  • 619 F.3d 126
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 18759
  • 93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,001
  • 110 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 385
  • 2010 WL 3490977

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that more than the “mere fact” that the plaintiff is a woman and another employee is a man is needed to show differential treatment based on gender
  • “The prima facie case varies according to the nature of the plaintiff’s claim but it requires, among other things, a showing of an adverse employment action.”
  • “The prima facie case varies according to the nature of the plaintiff’s claim but it requires, among other things, a showing 34 of an adverse employment action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Boudin, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.