Aluminum Company of America, Badin Works, Badin, North Carolina v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that denial of a motion to quash an administrative search warrant was dispositive requiring de novo review by the district court
• holding that, when district court specifically refers dispositive matter to magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012), district court is obligated to conduct de novo determination of magistrate judge’s order
• noting that district court need only determine whether order issued pursuant to § 636(b)(1)(A) is clearly erroneous or contrary to law and holding that, when a district court refers a matter 2 under § 636(b)(1)(B
• remanding when district court reviewed magistrate judge's report for clear error
• where district judge did not clearly indicate in his ruling that he afforded party filing timely objections de novo determination, matter would be remanded for de novo review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).