Alukonis v. Kashulines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a survey of a property did not interrupt the continuity of an adverse possession claim over that property
• stating that forty years of continuous and uninterrupted use of disputed strip to cut hay, garden, and grow crops, combined with fact that strip visually blended in with possessor’s lot due to rudimentary boundary monuments in his favor, constituted adverse possession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).