Aluise v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that damages for fraudulently or negligently misrepresenting the absence of structural damage and water seepage were economic and therefore not covered property damage
• stating hearsay evidence is not admissible for summary judgment purposes, unless it falls within one of the exceptions specified in the West Virginia Rules of Evidence
• “Rule 56(c) of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure does not contain an exhaustive list of materials that may be submitted in support of summary judgment. . . . [A] trial court may consider any material that would be admissible or usable at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).