Skip to main content
· 7/9/1981

Altschul v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis Inc.

Citations

  • 518 F. Supp. 591
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “By failing to object to the course of trading in the accounts for approximately two years despite ample opportunity to do so, the Altschuls must be held to have ratified the transactions conducted on their behalf.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lasker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.