Skip to main content
· 7/1/1874

Altschul v. Doyle

Citations

  • 48 Cal. 535
  • 1874 Cal. LEXIS 187

Syllabus

<p>G-banting New Teiad.—The Supreme Court will not interfere with the action of the Court below in granting or refusing a new trial, when there is a substantial conflict in the evidence, and the circumstance that, intermediate the trial and the determination of the motion for a new trial, a change in the incumbency of the bench in the Court below had occurred, makes no difference in the application of the rule.</p> <p>Idem.—When a new trial is asked for on several grounds, and it is granted, and the record does not show for which one of the reasons it was-granted, the order granting the new trial will not be reversed, if it may have been properly granted for any one of the reasons assigned.</p>

Judges: Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.