Alton Tyrone Marshall, Jr v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 1961 is not a subject unique to patent law and is governed by regional circuit law
• “the damages were meaningfully ascertained at the time of the initial district court judgment because that damages decision was ultimately correct on the merits” despite a procedural error warranting reversal and remand that resulted in same damages finding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).