Michigan Supreme Court· 6/13/2016

Altobelli v. Hartmann

Citations

499 Mich. 284
884 N.W.2d 537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “[t]he MLLCA explicitly refers to agency authority and the ability of individuals to act as agents for limited liability companies, which further supports the application of agency principles to interpret the instant arbitration clause”
analyzing “threshold question of whether a dispute is arbitrable” without reference to correction of only errors apparent on face of award
analyzing “threshold question of whether a dispute is arbitrable” without reference to correction of only errors apparent on face of award
“In considering the gravamen of plaintiff’s complaint, we examine the entire claim, looking beyond procedural labels to determine the exact nature of the claim.”
“In considering the gravamen of plaintiff’s complaint, we examine the entire claim, looking beyond procedural labels to determine the exact nature of the claim.”
“[I]t is well established that corporations can only act through officers and agents.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young, Markman, Zahra, McCormack, Viviano, Larsen, Bernstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Altobelli v. Hartmann

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.