Altman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversal not required because trial judge indicated that he did not rely upon the contested evidence and in fact found the defendant not guilty on the count supported by the evidence
• reversal not required because trial judge indicated that he did not rely upon the contested evidence and in fact found the defendant not guilty on the count supported by the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fox v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-09-05· cited 76×
• Konopasek v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2011-05-05· cited 61×
• Spranger v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-10-15· cited 59×
• Forehand v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 20×
• McCord v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-10-26· cited 20×
• Staton v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-09-28· cited 19×
• Shanks v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-09-28· cited 9×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hitch v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1972-07-07· cited 71×
• Elliott v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-07-12· cited 54×
• Gaunt v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1983-12-30· cited 41×
• Fletcher v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1976-01-29· cited 40×
• Johnson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1978-09-18· cited 21×
• Kruckeberg v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-07-25· cited 10×
• Gadacz v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-10-06· cited 10×
• Matter of Fasig
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1983-02-11· cited 2×