Skip to main content
· 12/21/1992

Altman v. Nelson

Citations

  • 495 N.W.2d 826
  • 197 Mich. App. 467

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that subject-matter jurisdiction concerns “the right of the court to exercise judicial power over a class of cases, not the particular case before it”
  • noting that “[j]urisdiction to make a determination is not dependent upon the correctness of the determination made”
  • noting that “[b]ecause the trial court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the parties, the action taken by the trial court, though involving an erroneous exercise of jurisdiction, was not void. . . .”
  • noting that “[b]ecause the trial court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the parties, the action taken by the trial court, though involving an erroneous exercise of jurisdiction, was not void. . . .”
  • the “question of jurisdiction does not depend on the truth or falsity of the charge, but upon its nature”
  • “The question of jurisdiction does not depend on the truth or falsity of the charge, but upon its nature: it is determinable on the commencement, not at the conclusion, of the inquiry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doctoroff, Reilly, Jansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.