· 7/12/2010
Altman v. Motion Water Sports, Inc.
Citations
- 722 F. Supp. 2d 234
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68935
- 2010 WL 2747306
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining why the “total lack of continuity of shareholders and directors” would be “fatal” if the court applied the traditional common law mere continuation exception, but application of the Connecticut’s “continuity of enterprise” version the exception supported a different conclusion
- “In Kendall the Appellate Court makes it plain that ‘continuity of enterprise’ is not just a theory of successor liability, it is a recognized principle of Connecticut law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haight
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.