Altevogt v. Brinkoetter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “[a builder’s] knowledge that a third party would occupy” did not render plaintiffs third-party beneficiaries to the contract between the builder and developer
• noting that, under Illinois law, a direct beneficiary is a person upon whom the contracting parties have manifested an intent to confer a benefit
• recognizing implied warranty of workmanship in construction contracts
• recognizing implied warranty of workmanship in construction contracts
• finding that even if the defendant builder of the house knew that the party with whom he contracted would not be the party to live there, knowledge that unknown third parties would reside in the house was insufficient to make those third parties direct beneficiaries
• finding that even if the defendant builder of the house knew that the party with whom he contracted would not be the party to live there, knowledge that unknown third parties would reside in the house was insufficient to make those third parties direct beneficiaries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).