Altevogt v. Brand

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiffs acknowledgement that others had an easement and used the disputed property is inconsistent with a claim of adverse possession and negated elements of control and intent
• holding that an admission that others have a right to use a trail and evidence that others do use the trail are “fatal” to claimants’ adverse possession claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).