Alternative Electrodes, LLC v. Empi, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• for purposes of surviving Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, allegation of a relevant product market consisting of replacement parts for a single brand was “reasonably alleged” at “this early stage” of the litigation
• “Courts are reluctant to dismiss antitrust claims for failure to plead the relevant market because determining the relevant market requires a fact-intensive inquiry that is best served by allowing the parties discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).