Alternate Fuels, Inc. v. Cabanas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a judgment-as-a-matter-of-law argument on appeal because the Rule 50(a) motion “gave no legal or factual basis”
• “[I]f the movant’s legal theories are not articulated before the verdict, review is limited to whether the judgment sought is required to prevent manifest injustice.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).