Skip to main content
· 11/8/2001

Alter Barge Line, Inc. v. Consolidated Grain & Barge Co., Appeal Of: Randy W. Pherigo, Claimant-Appellant

Citations

  • 272 F.3d 396
  • 2002 A.M.C. 472
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 24065
  • 2001 WL 1382676

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]n explanation rather than a justification for the delay will suffice” for late claimants in admiralty proceedings
  • “[T]he ‘cause’ required in this [admiralty] context is minimal; an explanation rather than a justification for the delay will suffice.”
  • “[w]e limit our holding to the facts of this case”
  • “[w]e limit our holding to the facts of this case”
  • “[L]ate claimants in admiralty proceedings need not show ‘good cause.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fairchild, Cudahy, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.