Altair Engineering, Inc. v. Leddynamics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s reliance on the patent figures to construe the term “closely-spaced”
• “[T]he figures and prosecution history support the district court’s claim construction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Voda v. Medtronic Inc.
  W.D. Oklahoma· 2011-12-14

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• New Hampshire v. Maine
  Supreme Court· 2001-05-29· cited 3,343×
• Pegram v. Herdrich
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 1,043×
• Browning v. Levy
  Sixth Circuit· 2002-03-12· cited 280×
• Key Pharmaceuticals v. Hercon Laboratories Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 1999-01-08· cited 260×
• Spectrum International, Inc. v. Sterilite Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 1998-12-09· cited 144×
• Andersen Corp. v. Fiber Composites, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2007-01-26· cited 124×
• Typeright Keyboard Corporation v. Microsoft Corporation, Defendant-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2004-07-06· cited 115×
• Springs Window Fashions Lp, Shade-O-Matic Ltd., and Manor Tec, Inc. v. Novo Industries, L.P., Defendant-Cross-Appellant
  Federal Circuit· 2003-02-13· cited 77×
• Biomedical Patent Management Corp. v. California
  Federal Circuit· 2007-10-23· cited 37×
• Checkpoint Systems, Inc. v. All-Tag Security s.a.
  Federal Circuit· 2005-06-20· cited 37×