Skip to main content
· 4/5/2004

Alston v. Parker

Citations

  • 363 F.3d 229
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 6425
  • 2004 WL 720230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a court should allow amendment of a complaint unless doing so would be inequitable or futile
  • holding that a court may deny leave to amend if a complaint is vulnerable to 12(b)(6) dismissal, if an “amendment would be inequitable or futile”
  • holding that a district court must permit a curative amendment “unless an amendment would be inequitable or futile”
  • holding that a district court must permit a curative amendment “unless an amendment would be inequitable or futile”
  • holding that district courts must permit a curative amendment within a set period of time unless such an amendment would be inequitable or futile
  • holding that “if a complaint is vulnerable to 12(b)(6) dismissal, a District Court must permit a curative amendment, unless an amendment would be inequitable or futile”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Rendell, Aldisert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.