Skip to main content
· 6/19/2008

Alston v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 561 F. Supp. 2d 29
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47329
  • 2008 WL 2461034

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Generally, arguments raised for the first time in a reply are waived.”
  • “the court nevertheless analyzes this claim under the appropriate law, Smith v. Mallick, 514 F.3d 48, 51 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (holding that courts have an independent obligation to apply the correct law regardless of the parties’ arguments)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ricardo M. Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.