Skip to main content
· 7/8/2010

Alston v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FLORIDA

Citations

  • 610 F.3d 1318
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 13897
  • 2010 WL 2680366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a claim challenging the state court’s determination of the petitioner’s competency during the post-conviction proceeding did not present a cognizable habeas claim
  • holding that a trial court must inquire into an allegation that the State failed to comply with discovery rules and determine whether any noncompliance prejudiced the defendant
  • “Federal habeas relief is available to remedy defects in a defendant’s conviction and sentence, but an alleged defect in a collateral proceeding does not state a basis for habeas relief.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubina, Birch, Bareett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.