Skip to main content
· 5/20/1996

Alston v. City of Camden

Citations

  • 471 S.E.2d 174
  • 322 S.C. 39
  • 11 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1337
  • 1996 S.C. LEXIS 87

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \South Carolina law is clear that public employees generally have no contractual rights in their employment merely by virtue of a statute describing the terms of that employment.\
  • “South Carolina law is clear that public employees generally have no contractual rights in their employment merely by virtue of a statute describing the terms of that employment.”
  • Davis Adv. Sh. No. 13 at 26
  • Davis Adv. Sh. No. 13 at 26

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Finney, Waller, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.