Alshami v. City Univ. of N.Y.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Bulldog II}. It is undisputed both that none of the defendants was registered as a broker-dealer or agent as required by §201(a), and that the promissory notes were not registered as required by §301. To prevail under §410(a)(1
• “offers are not limited to communications which constitute an offer in the common law contract sense, or which on their face purport to offer a security... they include any document which is designed to procure orders for a security”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).