Alsberry v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that lower court did not abuse its discretion by reimposing in its entirety a suspended sentence in excess of twenty-four -6- years based on the commission of two misdemeanor probation violations
• holding that the court did not abuse its discretion by imposing the defendant’s previously suspended sentence in its entirety in light of the nature of the original offenses and his “continuing criminal activity”
• holding that the court did not abuse its discretion by imposing the defendant’s previously suspended sentence in its entirety “in light of the grievous nature of [the defendant’s] offenses and his continuing criminal activity”
• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by imposing the defendant’s previously suspended sentence in its entirety, “in light of the grievous nature of [the defendant’s] offenses and his continuing criminal activity”
• holding no abuse of discretion in imposing all twenty-four years and five-and-a-half -8- months of a previously suspended sentence
• holding the court did not abuse its discretion by imposing the defendant’s previously suspended sentence in its entirety

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).