Alps South, LLC v. Ohio Willow Wood Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “Alps possessed neither legal title nor all substantial rights at the outset of the litigation”
• acknowledging \our practice of endorsing joinder of patent owners ... in order to avoid dismissal for lack of standing\
• remanding “with instructions for the 7 district court to dismiss [the plaintiff’s] complaint without prejudice”
• “The party asserting patent infringement is ‘required to have legal title to the patents on the day it filed the complaint and that requirement can not be met retroactively.’” (quoting Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. v. Navinta LLC, 625 F.3d 1359, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2010
• “The party asserting patent infringement is ‘required to have legal title to the patents on the day it filed the complaint and that requirement can not be met retroactively.’” (quoting Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. v. Navinta LLC, 625 F.3d 1359, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2010
• assignment made retroactive to date of previous, non-exclusive license

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).